Katherine's Climate Sci.

I didn’t say that. I said “after.” I’m sorry I didn’t have enough characters to completely convey the incomprehensible weight of these assorted assaults. That’s because IT ISN’T THE POINT.

Cool, so, we live in the world as it is, not as we would like it to be. So as I said, until we have UBI, artists should get paid for their work. You don’t work for free, I’m guessing. We don’t need to wait for the perfect solution to make sure people get paid for their work. Art is work.

Neither MIT nor JStor support the DOJ pursuing the case; it was a political choice. Also, when I said I’m not re-litigating this, I mean it. This is a derail.

I don’t think he’d be for using piracy to become a billionaire, and regardless, I’m not saying he’s endorse my message. I’m saying I, personally, don’t think it’s cool to have one set of rules for everyday folks and another set of rules for billionaires. I’m allowed to have an opinion on that.

If nobody will cop to turning off Ukraine's Starlink, it should be pretty straightforward to turn it back on right away.

Trump, who reportedly wears a diaper, says "leakers" should be shot? meidasnews.com/news/trump-s...

I don’t think it’s strong evidence for exceptionally high climate sensitivity. It does imply that we should probably expect warming of about 0.35 C/decade to continue if global greenhouse gas emissions stay around their current levels.

Math folks: how big of a deal is ChatGPT pumping out all these proofs? Is it just a case of "pattern finding machine good at finding patterns?" Or is it genuinely groundbreaking?

Warming prominently extends vertically aloft into the lower/mid-troposphere over the #Arctic region in October (i.e., notable Arctic amplification temperature trends). Data from @copernicusecmwf.bsky.social ERA5 reanalysis; possible influences of this warming: doi.org/10.1029/2020...

Yep, it wasn’t MIT or JStor. Both asked the DOJ not to.