Most popular posts by Online Political Thinkers community members over the last 24 hours. Updated hourly.
The Iranian schoolgirl, the cancer patient whose clinical trial was cancelled, the African AIDS patient who can't get treatment anymore — none of these are "real" to our media elites. Can't imagine themselves in that situation or visualize it. But "panic at the fancy gala!" on the other hand,
Fun fact: The Elvis impersonator who was arrested for sending ricin to Obama often recommended my work on Facebook. Fortunately (for me!), he was innocent. A different Elvis impersonator sent the ricin to frame the innocent Elvis impersonator b/c the latter falsely claimed to be a member of Mensa.
This insightful thread made me reflect on how I, a Gen Xer, was socialized to think about the political agency of ordinary citizens...and how those historical "lessons" that I'd imbibed, drawn from the history of the 1960s and 70s, just don't ring so true to today's young adults.
This is just so silly. Again, the WHCA is an independent organization that picks its own venues and would have no obligation to ask the White House to host a smaller version of the Dinner in the currently nonexistent ballroom. The President has to leave the White House sometimes!
I've been led to understand from decades of US gun violence that there's a variable window of "too soon to politicize this" during which discussions of gun control are verboten. It doesn't seem to apply to advocacy of the illegal demolition of a White House wing to build a party room out of bribes.
We're at 56 years and counting of a GOP-appointed SCOTUS majority, since 1970, and it's effectively self-perpetuating now. When presidential wins alternate near evenly. It doesn't take a partisan preference either way to see how insanely unhealthy that is. It's indefensible on neutral principles.
wrote about the supreme court, and why expanding it needs to be the first things Ds do in 2029 if they have a trifecta. the court is a fully committed to fascism. replacing a fascist president is good, but it's useless if you don't address the court. www.everythingishorrible.net/p/ds-must-ex...
It's all so stupid but worth underscoring even this event literally wouldn't fit, even his planned ginormous edifice isn't big enough for it. The WHCD is obnoxiously large, there were 2500 people in that room. On his own plans the throne room monument wouldn't fit more than a thousand.
Glad @paulwaldman.bsky.social wrote this. Trump isn't inviting people to try to kill him exactly, but he relishes it when it happens. His narcissism spins it up as another sign that he is the most importantest man to ever live. www.publicnotice.co/p/white-hous...
If Team Trump really understood public opinion, they wouldn’t focus their messaging on “he needs a ballroom.”They’d focus on the other parts of the structure. “Trump needs a bunker. Doesn’t he seem like the type of world leader who ends up in a bunker?” 100% public approval.
Democrats “don’t expect the media to take our side in any political battle… but we do expect them to take their own side in the fight for constitutional freedom. There is only one party in America trying to censor and control the press.” @raskin.house.gov to @gregsargent.bsky.social.
At the risk of getting ahead of myself, I think congressional Republicans might force a short-notice vote on Trump’s palace ballroom, and that it’d be a terrible omen of the usual suspect Dems defected to provide them bipartisan cover. www.offmessage.net/p/do-not-aut...
Claiming that America’s top national security priority is building the president a special ballroom to host parties would be ridiculous in normal times. It is decadent farce in the midst of a geopolitically significant war, one the president started and is losing. Yet said with a straight face.
There legitimately felt like there would be a push toward autism acceptance in the 2010s that coincided with larger acceptance toward transgender people. I wrote my first book in the afterglow of this. But I am tempted to write now about the backlash toward neurodiversity in the 2020s.
ICYMI yesterday: I wrote about one of the defining - and most dangerous - stories of our time: America’s tech barons are openly and aggressively siding with authoritarianism. An exploration of what is fueling their radicalization to the right – and why it is happening now:
Reacher series are a rare excpetion to this as lib airport lit. In one of the Reacher books Reacher, as part of a plot line of helping a family without health insurance, says to a Russian operative who spreads disinformation online: “when I said I would let you go? That was Fake News.” & shoots him
Everyone's like "public shaming doesn't work" "making an example of guys who behave anti-socially doesn't work" until they see a video of a grown man stealing a baseball from a little girl, then suddenly it's like "this guy should be tarred and feathered and hung by his feet from the scoreboard"
For many years, I worked with someone who was shot in the head during an assassination attempt at the Washington Hilton Jim Brady spent the rest of his life trying to make sure other families didn't experience gun violence Instead of addressing that deadly scourge, Republicans want a ballroom
Makes no 1A difference if Kimmel had joked about assassination. But he didn't. It was plainly about his age and health. He's got one foot in the grave, which is the ur platonic archetype of a "that guy's really old" joke. Plus "even his wife doesn't like him," which is the most basic of trash talk.
Missed it at the time, but this WSJ hed is a great example of cultural confusion. Calling somebody of the same generation but slightly older than you 'big brother' in Chinese doesn't imply any special closeness or friendship! It's a social norm! www.wsj.com/world/china/...
How did the meaning of "ceasefire" change from "fire ceases" to "some acts of war continue, and there's still some exchanges of fire, maybe it kills some people, but like not as much as before"? What is the official threshold for a ceasefire that is merely "strained" or "uneasy" rather than broken?
Once again putting my motion on the table, since the impeachment clause looks like a dead letter, for a majority vote next year to defund the entire Executive Office of the President. If Republicans embrace the fiction of the 'unitary executive,' let Trump fulfill that vision by operating solo.
"unless OpenAI can somehow pull a Tesla" is an important warning here, I'm constantly telling the AI bubble Cassandras that it's super possible to be 100% right about the core business and 100% wrong on valuation because everyone else wants the valuation story to be true in spite of the facts
NEW: Group won’t end its lawsuit to halt Trump’s ballroom. The National Trust for Historic Preservation said case rests on questions of executive authority, not national security. “The President must follow the law,” the group’s lawyer wrote in letter shared w me + @jonathanreports.bsky.social
I must say I’m not super impressed with responses that mock my piece for exploring the tech elite’s radicalizing trajectory because “Duh, they’re all fascist nerds, ‘nuff said!” That sort of reflexive anti-intellectualism is quite toxic to the political discourse (it’s also just really mean?).
I followed the MAHA mom rhetoric on this, and I cannot emphasize enough how much this is about their own egos and judgmentalism. They've convinced themselves only sluts and drug users have hep B positive babies. And they resent getting the same treatment. www.washingtonpost.com/health/2026/...
“The university ‘limited the work of Dr. Wu, partly closed her lab, broke up her research team, reassigned her grants to her white male faculty colleagues, and left her isolated.’ After the investigation, Northwestern allegedly ‘cut her salary for lack of funding’” www.nature.com/articles/d41...
"Hurry up the ballroom and bunker so Trump never has to leave the White House" sounds like "We need to take dad's keys so he won't keep trying to drive," except instead of concern for an elderly relative and others on the road, it's propping up a cult of personality that enables authoritarianism.
Our era's grand struggle is, to a significant extent, people who value truth and acknowledge reality vs. postmodern liars who say imagining makes real and demand everyone live inside their preferred fiction Any conspiracy theory serves the latter cause, because they detach people from reality more